Question 1 - there are a few good points about what conventions you used but not enough detail is included. - Keep your points short and sweet and 'to the point'. When talking about low-key lighting you start talking about your character and how the audience is watching a vulnerable character. It seems like you're just adding in words but with no real meaning to answering the question. The question is asking what codes and conventions have you followed and what codes and conventions have you challenged (not used, on purpose). This needed a little bit more in depth analysis and also using terminology like 'iconography' or 'symbolism' for things like the knife. Overall you need to be writing in more depth, detail and with a more sophisticated style, using all your film language and knowledge by this stage. Q2 - this needs some actual research done into how you may distribute your film if it were a real media text.Saying 'it isn't a real film so I would just upload to Youtube' isn't answering the question. You did a good job of thinking about the narrative and characters although you cannot say your film is shot in 'no one's point of view' as it is always from someone's POV. If it is not the victim or the perpetrator then it is from the point of view of someone watching it all unfold, a third person. And a lot of the shots are actually of the point of view of the kidnapper. Q 3 - needs photos of things you learnt / images - some good lessons learnt and some good critical thinking about what you can do better next time. - one major thing was your sound that didn't work / record. This is something you need to include in your CCR.
Q4 - including pictures of equipment / screenshots of online things you used
Loading... How does your product engage with audiences? How would you distribute it as a real media text? Question 3 by Mele Leaaetalafoou Question Four by Mele Leaaetalafoou
Question 4 by Mele Leaaetalafoou
Hi Mele
ReplyDeleteOverall Score: 13/20
Question 1
- there are a few good points about what conventions you used but not enough detail is included.
- Keep your points short and sweet and 'to the point'. When talking about low-key lighting you start talking about your character and how the audience is watching a vulnerable character. It seems like you're just adding in words but with no real meaning to answering the question.
The question is asking what codes and conventions have you followed and what codes and conventions have you challenged (not used, on purpose). This needed a little bit more in depth analysis and also using terminology like 'iconography' or 'symbolism' for things like the knife.
Overall you need to be writing in more depth, detail and with a more sophisticated style, using all your film language and knowledge by this stage.
Q2
- this needs some actual research done into how you may distribute your film if it were a real media text.Saying 'it isn't a real film so I would just upload to Youtube' isn't answering the question.
You did a good job of thinking about the narrative and characters although you cannot say your film is shot in 'no one's point of view' as it is always from someone's POV. If it is not the victim or the perpetrator then it is from the point of view of someone watching it all unfold, a third person. And a lot of the shots are actually of the point of view of the kidnapper.
Q 3
- needs photos of things you learnt / images
- some good lessons learnt and some good critical thinking about what you can do better next time.
- one major thing was your sound that didn't work / record. This is something you need to include in your CCR.
Q4
- including pictures of equipment / screenshots of online things you used